Who watches the watchers?
Type: Posts; User: ZenBubba
Who watches the watchers?
Actually you can assuming the most fortuitous circumstances it's not possible.
What facts would those be Prince?
Your butt must hurt from all those "facts" that you are puling out from it. :laugh:
The Cursorial and Arboreal theories are at odds with one another....
No consequences? It seems like only heathens buy into the idea of no consequences.
If you want to hang your hat on methodical naturalism then there are going to be things you never know.
That's OK with me but when what you're claiming doesn't line up with the scientific method...
A theory that offers no predictive insight? Science goes out the window with you evolutionists.
I don't think it matters who we vote for any longer. Our presidents are chosen for us by the banks.
Christian doctrine is less confusing to Christians than non-Christians.
That's another way of saying it's a story that can't be explained.
Who knows? The response will be entertaining if they do.
Is she wearing a bullet bra on her head?
That's due to a loss of information. that's why there are less species than we started out with and not more. Loss of information in DNA can be demonstrated but not gain.
That's a real problem...
Pfft, they don't know whether birds came down from the trees and became lizards or if lizards climbed up the trees and became birds.
The question becomes, "Can anyone be a good politician?"
If the answer is no, then all is lost and it's a question without a point.
But if you want a politician that can be assessed by his or...
It has to be useful and beneficial and even then you are referring to adaptation.
That's it. Don't address the issue but deflect.
You guys bring it back to religion because it can't pass scientific muster. The old tired dodge.
Whatever helps you hold on to your beliefs I suppose, but you are paying a huge intellectual price.
You may. :laugh:
Gravity can be demonstrated. Particles to people? Not so much.
I don't install drywall. It's harder than it looks. :grin:
I stated that the link to the paper was not in the article referred to i the OP which was the truth. Then a link was provided due to my...
Duplication obviously isn't adding any new information. Two copies of a Calculus textbook contains no more new information than one copy.
Inserting new information that is meaningless isn't...
These days you have to triangulate. Sometimes they lie but many times they carefully present the truth to deceive you into making an incorrect inference.
I wouldn't be embarrassed to be a construction worker but that doesn't describe what I do for a living. What I do doesn't matter. The truth is the truth. I didn't claim that anyone lied. I pointed...
You sound like a normal person. I don't know if you'll like it here but welcome. :grin:
Change in allele frequency = evolution and evolution = change in allele frequency.
The discussion is a bit more complex than you may realize. For instance almost everyone agrees that evolution =...
A new line of BS emerges! Man you guys are sure creative. You've been withholding this tidbit for a year now because it was too hard to explain? :laugh:
It sounds like you are saying that a bunch...
That's the kind of link that you would expect an artist that lied about being a scientist would post. It contains no information about how information was added.
Go make a black light poster or...
That's simply another one of your deceptions. You have never shown it nor will you now.
All that is required is a coherent definition of evolution. What's a few KBs among friends?
You've never answered the question and you never will because you can't.
That's your response? It's a Dodge because evolution can't stand scientific scrutiny.
Yeah right. :grin: The definition is what they call fluid.