There are threads floating around regarding the Win & Win Inno AXT. Just because this is the internet, how about some armchair comparison?
I was wondering what the difference in shape might be between the WinEx and the new WinAct VT. While I was at it, I figured I'd include the older, discontinued WinAct to see what differences there are. I'm considering a new riser so I can hand my current riser down to my daughter as an upgrade for her.
Important: I didn't take these photos. I got them all from Lancaster Archery. There are almost certainly differences visible that are caused purely by minute differences in camera angle and lens focal length. I tried to align the images as carefully as possible on the Berger holes, with the scaling adjusted so the holes are the same size and distance apart, as well as generally the same overall riser length.
First, the WinAct versus the WinAct VT
Next, the WinAct VT versus the WinEx
And last, the WinEx versus the WinAct
I'm not certain any real conclusions can be drawn from these images but I do notice this: the WinAct VT has a markedly different shape below the grip. I suspect this affects the center of gravity as well as the way the riser transmits/absorbs vibration.
Has anyone tried the WinEx and the new WinAct VT that could offer some comparisons? I don't have access to either riser in-person, so I'll just have to live vicariously through others. I include the older WinAct for comparison only - if I get a new riser it'll probably be the VT or the WinEx.
-Kent W.
I was wondering what the difference in shape might be between the WinEx and the new WinAct VT. While I was at it, I figured I'd include the older, discontinued WinAct to see what differences there are. I'm considering a new riser so I can hand my current riser down to my daughter as an upgrade for her.
Important: I didn't take these photos. I got them all from Lancaster Archery. There are almost certainly differences visible that are caused purely by minute differences in camera angle and lens focal length. I tried to align the images as carefully as possible on the Berger holes, with the scaling adjusted so the holes are the same size and distance apart, as well as generally the same overall riser length.
First, the WinAct versus the WinAct VT
Next, the WinAct VT versus the WinEx
And last, the WinEx versus the WinAct
I'm not certain any real conclusions can be drawn from these images but I do notice this: the WinAct VT has a markedly different shape below the grip. I suspect this affects the center of gravity as well as the way the riser transmits/absorbs vibration.
Has anyone tried the WinEx and the new WinAct VT that could offer some comparisons? I don't have access to either riser in-person, so I'll just have to live vicariously through others. I include the older WinAct for comparison only - if I get a new riser it'll probably be the VT or the WinEx.
-Kent W.