I'm on this wagon as well....
with what you have now....realistically you are 50/50 on seeing a deer running away with half your arrow hanging out....or more. If you'd get different heads. I just simply can't jump on that rage bandwagon, there is no need for a large cutting diameter. My opinion is, if you are shooting bigger heads to make up for a bad shot, you are already going into the woods with less than ideal confidence in your abilities. you can put down a deer, any deer with a 1 inch sonic if you get two lungs or heart. Single lung Big diameter cuts don't mean faster recovery. I've been on several Rage tracking jobs and contrary to popular belief, not every hit is like throwing an axe through them. Deer do go un-recovered with wide cuts. I also know a guy with a hound, he's seen plenty Rage hit deer go a LONG way. most times the dog pushes them to expiration.
go with confidence, go with an fixed head at that weight arrow. that would be cheaper than buying new arrows. IMO, you probably don't have an arrow properly spined to add 100 more grains up front. Cheapest option is to buy a COC head. I would go with a lesser angled head as well. the magnus hornets never proved that theory correct for me ( i'm at 600 TAW), but I don't like the greater blade angle hornet for you. magnus stinger or buzz cut would be a better option IMO. the Buzz cut or stinger don't look cool or bad azz, but they work. there are many longer ferruled, lesser blade angle heads on the market, pick one.
Also, think of this way....how do the traditional archers kill deer and get good penetration? in your case, my recommendation is a longer head, lesser blade angle. The trad guy is also throwing logs, but that will cost you more money.