I just seen a article Whitetail Journal that say's the stryker will do 405fps wirh 155ft-lbs kinetic energy?
willie said:Speed sells.
We are WAY into overkill now with any crossbow going..
There was never an argument, only a fear from a few that something might change and that somehow hurts their hunt.twogun said:We've faced the argument that crossbow technology is just beginning because of its limited market and that if they take hold the competition for the excpanding market will drive the technology way beyond the compound bow capabilities. Is this a sign that they were right?
I've often thought that the best situation for the bow manufacturers would be to have a separate crossbow season. That might motivate hunters to buy two bows. The manufacturers could continue to capitalize on the compound market and jump into the crossbow market at the same time. If they can create crossbows that far surpass compounds, That will be far easier.
BigBirdVA said:There was never an argument, only a fear from a few that something might change and that somehow hurts their hunt.
There wasn't a separate compound season and they are twice as fast, twice as easy as long bows. Muzzle loaders now have twice the range too. Everyone wants more - they're getting it. Even at 405fps it's still not any faster than that High Country bow claims to be. Others have a compound bow in the 350fps range out. The choice is there for those that want it. Choice is what it's all about - not restrictions. If xbows become the preferred weapon then so be it. It doesn't impact another's choice to use what they want to. With xbows no one looses a thing. Zero impact in every study or report out there.
Nice try on the anti angle on a new xbow. Same fps exists for compounds so this just shows your intent - again.
Just more proof you come here for one thing.twogun said::wacko: :brick: :smokin: :Cry: :violin: :hug:
..
I can see how you've taken some speed off with a longer string, by taking the poundage down. I don't think changing the bolt weight changes the KE delivered though. The amount of drop at longer distances is significantly reduced with speed.awshucks said:Twogun: I've got an Emax, the one Bill T. shot clean thru an elephant with. I've tamed mine down by using heavier arrow and different string. I'm still a tad over 100 ft lbs on k.e. It sits on the rack alot while I shoot another bow, lol. Dang thing will flat wear you out. I can just imagine another 55 ft lbs of k.e. The arrows still drop a bunch after 20 no matter which bow you have, this new one won't be that much different, in that respect. I just can't see the possible benefits from the hype.
I think the same could be said for a number of compounds.willie said:Speed sells.
We are WAY into overkill now with any crossbow going..
YEP...oldbhtrnewequip said:I think the same could be said for a number of compounds.
allegiance comes in with ~320 fps with 87 fpe.
awshucks said:Notice there's no info on what pound pull this beast is??
kpsingleton said:But could you imagine how loud it will be! I just can't see something like that as being quiet.
Kinetic Energy is directly proportional to arrow weight with increases in weight more than offsetting the decrease in speed. For any kind of bow device Output KE / Input Work increases with arrow mass.oldbhtrnewequip said:I don't think changing the bolt weight changes the KE delivered though.
Nope. Just know you and your motive. We've all seen it many times before.twogun said:BigBird,
Are you stoned, or just terribly confused?![]()
![]()
It's official. You're stoned.BigBirdVA said:Nope. Just know you and your motive. We've all seen it many times before.
Me thinks you have two-gun confused with someone else..BigBirdVA said:Nope. Just know you and your motive. We've all seen it many times before.
Ok. ok,.... not stoned more along the lines of the confused part. Geesh, sorry about that. I've been having an extremely stressed week with major employee problems and other stuff heaped on there just because it could.twogun said:BigBird,
Are you stoned, or just terribly confused?![]()
![]()