Archery Talk Forum banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,771 Posts
well..... let's see some of the websites that you guys designed in 1996. Those were pretty hot in 96. :)

sure they look a little dorky now, but if was pretty good work considering the tools available at the time. It wasn't as automatic as it is now.

Ken Melus is our web guru and he also keeps this site running smooth. He made that Martin site back then, and I thought it was pretty good at the time.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,519 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 · (Edited)
GRIV said:
well..... let's see some of the websites that you guys designed in 1996. Those were pretty hot in 96. :)

sure they look a little dorky now, but if was pretty good work considering the tools available at the time. It wasn't as automatic as it is now.

Ken Melus is our web guru and he also keeps this site running smooth. He made that Martin site back then, and I thought it was pretty good at the time.
Damn!!! I didnt say that the Martins site was that ****ty. I said MATHEWS,:)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,685 Posts
Cool thread, Grndzer.

Wow, the Martin Scepter is much better looking than the Scepter 2 and Scepter 3 imo.
Does anyone else agree ?
That is a fancy looking riser.
I had seen it before but forgot how it looked.
Why doesn't Martin put craftsmanship like that in today's bows ?



Sag.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top