I thought this might be useful.
Note how on the overlayed image the front edges of the plates are lined up, so that you can see how much of the length difference is in the plates, and how much is in the faces. These are dimensions that they should have included but unfortunately didn't.
I haven't gone through the hassle of checking definitively, but I think it's safe to assume that the four diagrams are all to scale with one another.
Of note:
![]()
![]()
Note how on the overlayed image the front edges of the plates are lined up, so that you can see how much of the length difference is in the plates, and how much is in the faces. These are dimensions that they should have included but unfortunately didn't.
I haven't gone through the hassle of checking definitively, but I think it's safe to assume that the four diagrams are all to scale with one another.
Of note:
- There are indeed 4 different plate sizes, each unique.
- The faces are longer, not just wider (another member recently commented that the large and medium faces only differed in width and not length, this is not the case.)
- Interesting how the Large and X-Large angle out at the outer edge of the 3rd finger. Not sure why this is. This has a big impact on overall face width, while there is considerably less difference in plate width.
