Archery Talk Forum banner

Are Rinehart targets worth the money?

6.6K views 36 replies 31 participants last post by  mertzga  
#1 ·
I am Looking for a new 3D target this year!
My kids enjoy shooting them also.

We have always purchased the $100 targets

Are the Rinehart line of targets worth the money?

Thanks for your time!
 
#2 ·
I have the 18-1 target and its about 10 yrs old. I still haven't shot it out and that says a lot. I have torn chunks out of it shooting it with fixed blade broadheads and just used some spray foam to fill the holes and kept on shooting it. I haven't used the 3D deer targets, but I'd assume they would hold up quite well. I've bought several of the cheaper deer 3D targets and have yet to get more than 2 years out of one, but mileage will vary according to how you keep your target out of the weather or keep them inside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDS
#3 · (Edited)
I was not pleased with the cheaper "woodland" series Rinehart. I shot the insert out of a Jimmy Big Tine in 3 weeks and a replacement insert in about a month. They just aren't thick enough. I had a similar experience with the Rinehart Block target. The insert would last one season and then be shot and I'd have to buy a new $60 insert (if you could find one).

Look at the Bigshot "Real Wild" targets. The prices aren't terrible and they hold up a lot better. I've had one of theirs with the replaceable insert for about two years and it has been great. I'll be buying a hog or bear target from them next. If I was going to get another deer from them it would be one where the whole middle section is replaceable because I think those are a bit thicker and made to last longer.

 
#30 ·
I sure hope your recommendation on the Big Shot Real Wild 3D is valid, because I got one for Christmas that is still in the box. I opened it up when I tore off the wrapping paper to inspect it, then took it downstairs to wait for late summer. I don't pound my 3D's year around.....and certainly not with BH's.....because they don't seem to take a lot of abuse very well. Espeically the DM's, which just don't last with focused shooting. I have their Riverbottom version that I have literally doubled the initial investment cost in replacement kill zones in just a couple years.

My Rinehart turkey held up pretty well, but it is an earlier version and I can't find a kill zone replacement. Same for a Rinehart sold through Cabela's......it took a while to beat it up and when I contacted Rinehart, I found out they don't make those kill zones any longer either. So I am 0-2 with Rinehart, other than an 18-in-1 (that I guess we cannot talk about) and also a Rhinoblock that I use strictly for tuning indoors. I don't sleep with it, but it has never been outdoors as I do my initial bare shaft tuning inside.
 
#4 ·
The 18-1 target has lasted me quite a while, until it was shot up enough that I started shooting it with broadheads. I have the bigger one with removeable insert but think the 18-1 is the best value. I guess stay away from their bag targets though.
 
#7 ·
In a word yes, but the signature series is better. However, I will only shoot properly sized field points at my targets. If I need to tune broad heads I shoot at a single target I’ve designated as I don’t care what happens to this one!

Edited to add; If you are shooting 100 arrows a day at anything it’s going to wear out.
 
#9 ·
Good lord people! He's asking about 3D targets! Not broadhead targets! We get it, you sleep with you 18-1 in your bed with you every night to keep it warm and dry, and it's the best thing since canned spam, but he isn't asking about those!
 
#10 ·
Big Shot is actually having a huge sale on some of their “blems”…. Most are just paint issues and have nothing to do with the integrity of the target…..our club bought a bunch this past week and there were tons left to be had. They are also selling pieces….center sections and cores , for the targets with inserts. We bought a bunch of them also as well as spare heads.
 
#16 ·
Pretty sure that's local pick-up only, though. Driving to PA for some targets from south Georgia isn't in the cards for me. I mean, I'm all for it, but I'd probably be locked out of the house when I got back.
 
#15 ·
I prefer doing the bulk of my practice (especially with broadheads) on a rhinobrute or big high roller. The rhinobrute seems to take punishment a bit better than the high roller. I use the 3d targets to shoot scoring rounds - that seems to prolong the life of the 3Ds.

That being said, I have 10 3Ds. 8 rhineharts and 2 DMs. the only 1 that Ive really torn up is the woodland bore. replaced the insert and its good to go.
 
#19 ·
Yes, the 3D Rinehart series is worth the money. I don't care for the Woodland series.

Like quinnjalan noted above: "If you are shooting 100 arrows a day at anything it’s going to wear out. "

I will say McKenzie makes a comparable 3D target - replacement center wise. Some of their bodies are okay and others not. I hate screw-on or stick-in legs. And their bodies have never been noted to hold up - not with setting up and tearing down gorilla handling crews.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCFox
#22 ·
Agreed. Rineharts have been my go-to choice for many years. I originally became a fan of Rinehart in the early 2000's. Although some of the early targets eventually wore out (or were destroyed by a bear), I've still got a couple of earlier generation Rinehart 3D targets (browsing deer, black panther) from the 2004-2006 timeframe. The foam on the bodies of the older model targets has finally dried out after almost 20 years, but I replace the inserts every couple of years so the bodies only matter for holding the inserts.

All of my targets are outside 365 days a year and are covered with grill covers when not in use. I have a number of the Signature Series and Woodland targets. I absolutely love the Signature Series targets, although they are pricey. The foam stays flexible for many years, arrow removal is easy and replacement inserts are easily obtainable. IMHO, buy once cry once.

For the Woodland targets, the inserts are the same foam and same quality as the Signature Series, but the bodies of the Woodland targets are lesser quality with a closer feel to Delta/MacKenzie. The bodies of the Woodland targets last a decent amount of time, but not any more than competing products. For example, I had a Woodland turkey target that only lasted three years before the target body would no longer hold the insert properly. The body dried out and was slightly misshaped after replacing the insert three times. The new insert would get knocked out each time I shot it, so that gave me an excuse to upgrade to a Signature Series Rinehart.

So, my advice is to go with a Signature Series Rinehart if you can afford it. If not, the Woodland series will do fine, but there are also competing products that will do as well (as mentioned by others in this thread).
 
#21 ·
Good foam. One piece targets are easier to set in rough terrain. More resistance to weather and insects than most. Smaller kill zones than some. One thing is that for youth and trad equipment you can shoot a 3D animal regularly. Modern compounds shoot hard. I’d reserve any 3d target for preseason prep, youth introduction and scoring. Not the best choice for banging type groups on a regular basis. They all will wear prematurely under this type of use. Just my experience.
 
#24 ·
Keep an eye out on Camofire.com they have decent deals on targets every now and then. They're a 24hr flash sale sight. So if they don't have what you're looking for today, look tomorrow, and the next day...
It changes new products every day. Usually coincides with hunting seasons etc.

I think the last 18-1 I seen on there was $115
 
#32 ·
I have mostly signature and few woodland series. Both are great targets. For each price point they are the best you are gonna get in my view for 3d's.
I haven't had any issues with any of them after many years. I don't shoot broadheads at them and I cover them when not using with 6mil plastic "bags" I made.