Ok, I'm trying to be good, but I want to add one more statement to my list. When anyone makes a general statement about ANY bow (or most anything else) such as "it's the best", it should always be preceeded by "In my opinion". I had a very pleasant phone conversation with Mr. Ken Beck a couple of months ago, and even he said that when it comes to performance, there isn't a nickle's worth of difference in the better bows today.
BW recurves have good speed, are well made, are generally pleasing to the eye, etc., BUT a whole lot of bows meet this criteria. If there's a set of standards put out by an independant council to rate the "best", I have never seen or heard of it, so it boils down to opinion.
I couldn't begin to name all the bows I've owned, much less the one's I've shot. Some I knew intimately, some I shot very little. I wouldn't consider myself an expert on any of them. At best, I have above average knowledge of a few, and even though I've probably owned well over 100 different bows, there's hundreds more I haven't owned, or even shot. There's quite a few of the big names I haven't owned, not to mention the smaller and/or lesser known bows, plus the new ones that seem to be popping up on a regular basis. I don't think anyone could live long enough to have intimate knowledge of them all--from a shooter's prospective--so how could anyone say that one or another is the absolute best, period?
Even the part about BW (or any bow) being a bargain depends on your point of view. Shoot one for 14 years, only loose $210 of the original retail on it. That's great, but 14 years ago you could buy a nice bow for less than $210 and still sell it today for near that. There's a few out there, including some older BW bows, that will bring more now than they sold for new (now THAT is a bargain!).
Anyhow, to get to the point, it's all relative and boils down to personal opinion. Very, very few things in this sport are set in stone. That's my opinion anyway.:wink:
Chad