Which would you say is the better spray?
I most certainly did listen to the video. They simply state "the university". What University? Wheres the research paper? What were the conditions of the experiment? What animals were included in the experiment? Sounds like a dog was one.Cool story. No, really. How deep into Spike's jock did you dig for that response? You do realize the DOJ filing is public record, right? You do also realize this company would beheld liable by the DOJ if they released public information regarding the DOJ that was false, right?
If you took the time to read the information on their site and/or had watched the video in the link, you would've seen/heard the reference of a 3rd part university study supporting thier research and claims and you would've seen how the product works. It's not rocket science either. It's basic physiology. If your olfactory epithelium were to be numbed, you wouldn't be able to detect the smell of apple pie if someone slammed your face in it.
But again, Scent Thief has provided all of the supporting information you and your boy Spike said wasn't provided so it's clear there is zero chance of either of you two having an objective open minded conversation about this. I don't work for them and I damn sure don't need to prove/validate anything I say or do to either of your two so go ahead and make your condescending comments and insults and continue on with your deflections and continued calls for "proof" when you're not interested in anything that differs from your narrative. The information is out there for anyone and everyone to see. Do with it what you will, if anything at all. ✌
It's no secret you're not interested in an objective dialogue on this topic. You had your mind made up on this topic before you made your first post, let alone any post you've made specifically about Scent Thief. Buy it, don't buy it. Use it, don't use it. Believe it, don't believe it. It's really no sweat off my back one way or the other but you act like someone is trying to force you to do something you don't want to do.I most certainly did listen to the video. They simply state "the university". What University? Wheres the research paper? What were the conditions of the experiment? What animals were included in the experiment? Sounds like a dog was one.
I'm willing to take ANY legal advantage I can if it gives me an advantage over a mature buck. ANY. Name it I'll take it if it works. Im interested. I may email the company asking to see the actual research papers. They're probably as real as the cookie monster, but I may be surprised yet. This is not sarcasm.
Then they state in the video, they had to tame the product down so dogs can properly smell drugs. If the dog can still smell drugs, you can bet and take it to the bank a buck will still smell you
And yet there are just as many tests out there that show it does work. Which tests one chooses to believe is based solely on their subjective views on the matter. If you're a person that doesn't believe scent control products work, you'll ignore any tests showing support for their claims and instead focus on any tests that may debunk their claims and vice versa.Its sad really.
There are many tests where this stuff has been proven not to work….but there are still hunters that continue to throw money away on it.
Yeah, its a free country…their money and all that…but its sad to think there are so many people in the US that are easily fooled.
"Ill pay $1,000 to anyone that provides me with an experience, fooling a dogs nose, using any scent control you can come up with." Bitch in Heat urine with a splash of red cayenne on a piece of T shirt ended a tracking dogs day more than one time. Did a study at the tracking school I worked at.
Not to wax to philosophical, but that is the world we live in today. Too much data and not enough real information. I can make a solid argument for using these products and not, heavy or light arrows, mechanical or fixed, single or double bevel, FOC or who cares. All of this data is really more confusion than help these days.And yet there are just as many tests out there that show it does work. Which tests one chooses to believe is based solely on their subjective views on the matter. If you're a person that doesn't believe scent control products work, you'll ignore any tests showing support for their claims and instead focus on any tests that may debunk their claims and vice versa.
It's equally as sad to think there are so many people out there that believe anything and everything being sold is a scam. I couldn't imagine living with such delusion and paranoia.
"Altering the animal" I'm truly beginning to believe you ARE a liberal politician.Again, altering the animal, isn’t scent control.
8030 wouldn’t agree, though.
He probably just shoots them in the face, and calls it future scent control lol!
^^^THIS^^^And learn when scent rises or falls.
Finally, somebody else with some dang common senseNeither..because both won’t help you in any way, whatsoever.
Your scent isn’t on your clothes.
It emits from gases expelled from your body and bacteria laden skin cells that slough off your body by the millions.
No amount of spritzing, will impact your core scent, in any appreciable way.
I think some deer actually might like a good cheeseburger. Have you seen the videos of deer eating steak? Or even baby birds out of nests, etcYou saying deer don’t like cheese burgers?
If even deer can't pass up a good steak, how the heck do these liberal vegans do it? They must be closet steak eatersI think some deer actually might like a good cheeseburger. Have you seen the videos of deer eating steak? Or even baby birds out of nests, etc
"Altering the animal" I'm truly beginning to believe you ARE a liberal politician.![]()
I'm pretty sure it's the same deer after as it was before but yeah... "altering the animal"...If I temporarily "alter" your ability to smell, I haven't altered who you are or what you are. You'd be the same troll you were before and after. You just couldn't identify specific scents temporarily.
Like I said, I'm not going to hold you to your word, which obviously isn't worth a plug nickel anyway, and let you off the hook for the $1000 so you can drop the theatrics and you can quit spinning and twisting your words to deflect away from you originally said. We all see who you are and non one was shocked or surprised.