I think the F & S and Outdoor Life bow of the year articles are a big farce. F & S picks the Tribute and OL puts the Tribute in 3rd place. When a bow is that good, how do you end up with a 1st and a 3rd. Next, look at the bows they tested. There were several good bows that did not even make the test, yet they tested bows that almost no one buys. I am in no way down on the tribute, it is a great bow and Bowtech is in the top 3 for me in choosing an '07 model. I just think that when it comes to the top 8-10 bows that are sold, it is such a personal thing how can you pick the best. I think something in the line of a Consumer Reports type test would be the best. Test them in several areas and make comments, list reliability history, show options and then give a "Best Buy" awards and a "Recommended" list. We know what we like and what we are looking for. We can then take this info and go to the proshop and shot the ones that interest us the most and make the best decision for us.
What do you all think?