I don't know if this subject is already beaten to death but I can't really find a clear answer.
I am contemplating a switch from freestyle recurve to compound because of some physical issues in my draw hand.
I visited a few bow shops and for some reason I am drawn more towards the hunting style bows instead of the target bows but I do shoot mostly target (18, 30, 50 and 70m).
True target compounds have longer axle-to-axle lengths (up to 40") which supposedly gives a higher stability.
The thing is that I am not and will never be a top ranking Archer will it really make a huge difference if I would opt for a somewhat shorter bow like the Mathews No Cam HTR which has a 32" axle-to-axle length.
Basically it comes down to the question if it is possible to comfortably reach a 70m FITA target with a 'hunting' bow and achieve scores that are within the 8 ring of a fita target.
I am contemplating a switch from freestyle recurve to compound because of some physical issues in my draw hand.
I visited a few bow shops and for some reason I am drawn more towards the hunting style bows instead of the target bows but I do shoot mostly target (18, 30, 50 and 70m).
True target compounds have longer axle-to-axle lengths (up to 40") which supposedly gives a higher stability.
The thing is that I am not and will never be a top ranking Archer will it really make a huge difference if I would opt for a somewhat shorter bow like the Mathews No Cam HTR which has a 32" axle-to-axle length.
Basically it comes down to the question if it is possible to comfortably reach a 70m FITA target with a 'hunting' bow and achieve scores that are within the 8 ring of a fita target.