Joined
·
615 Posts
I saw an article by Jeff Murray in a recent bowhunting mag and wasn't real surprised ... but just a little surprised.
The name stood out because I have a book I bought off the discount shelf for $4.99 called "For Big Bucks Only”. Jeff Murray is the author and on one page is picture of him in a treestand holding a gun looking down on a buck that he 'caught doubling back through a drive' ... Then on another page was a picture of the same buck(!) with Jeff in the background climbing down from a stand, with a bow hanging there, and the caption under that pic said that he 'arrowed this buck near a beaver pond'
Not long after that, I saw him in a video. A really nice deer came walking by broadside at 10-15 yards(?) (This was a guided hunt in Iowa – which seems to be a more popular way of building a reputation as an expert than hunting the big woods of northern MN.) The film freezes at the sound of the shot, you hear the crack of the impact of a shot that may not have been ideal. Then it cuts to the “pro/expert” holding the rack in the dark, and the first words out of his mouth were “See folks, this is what I’m talking about…”
Whatever … but to see him touted as a bowhunting or whitetail expert in a current magazine? It just doesn’t sit very well.
Maybe I have him all wrong and these were just two isolated mistakes? Is his reputation as an expert based on anything solid?
The name stood out because I have a book I bought off the discount shelf for $4.99 called "For Big Bucks Only”. Jeff Murray is the author and on one page is picture of him in a treestand holding a gun looking down on a buck that he 'caught doubling back through a drive' ... Then on another page was a picture of the same buck(!) with Jeff in the background climbing down from a stand, with a bow hanging there, and the caption under that pic said that he 'arrowed this buck near a beaver pond'
Not long after that, I saw him in a video. A really nice deer came walking by broadside at 10-15 yards(?) (This was a guided hunt in Iowa – which seems to be a more popular way of building a reputation as an expert than hunting the big woods of northern MN.) The film freezes at the sound of the shot, you hear the crack of the impact of a shot that may not have been ideal. Then it cuts to the “pro/expert” holding the rack in the dark, and the first words out of his mouth were “See folks, this is what I’m talking about…”
Whatever … but to see him touted as a bowhunting or whitetail expert in a current magazine? It just doesn’t sit very well.
Maybe I have him all wrong and these were just two isolated mistakes? Is his reputation as an expert based on anything solid?