Archery Talk Forum banner

Jennings Compound Bows pre-1970s

18K views 33 replies 10 participants last post by  RealDakota  
#1 ·
Jennings through the years made alot of claims as being the first compound bow manufacturer (the facts clearly demonstrate that Allen invented and market the first compounds) and I have seen Allen bows pre-dating the issuance of his patent in 1969 but I have never seen a Jennings nor have I seen a picture of a Jennings bow prior to the early 70s. I have seen his early ads all featuring a pic from a 1967 flight contest in which the guy is shooting an Allen. But has anyone out there in AT land ever seen or have pics of a Jennings bow made before 1970???
 
#9 ·
Jennings vrs. Allen

Allen made far less bows than Jennings ever did. He never wanted to produce bows, he just had no choice. Allen did get the patent for the Compound however: many believe he saw one before he made one. Tom Jennings made the Compound Bow a reality. Tom Jennings is the "God Father" of the Compound Bow!
 
#11 ·
I would agree that Jennings was the chief promoter of the compound and was a far better salesman than Allen, but I do not know of any evidence that Allen was not the sole inventor of the compound. I have read of speculation too, but never have I seen any of it backed up. So IMHO Allen should be crdited with this accomplishment that has changed archery forever.
 
#20 ·
I currently shoot a Browning Rage. This is considered by most to be a very conventional and conservative bow, that is it shares many of the same angular relationships with this Jennings legacy bow. The riser height and the angular relationship between riser and limbs are basicly the same. The Rage in this regard is an unremarkable bow and yet it has a very different appearance.

It makes be wonder what the conservative and uber high tech bow lineup for 2020 will look like?! I for one cant wait.
 
#22 ·
For what it's worth:

I owned and shot Allen bows in the late 1960's and early 1970's and also owned and shot Jennings' in both indoor league and hunting situations.

Clearly, the Jennings were a more refined item. I was driving to Monett, MO in 1976 and while southhbound below Springfield, MO, glanced at the right side of the road and saw a modest garage almost AT the side of the road with a sign on its upper edge indicating it was the "home of the Allen compound bow". I stopped and spoke with Mr. Allen, who I want to recall, preferred "Harold" to his given name of Holless. He appeared to be in his early 50's, in good health, rather quiet, but very polite. He told me that he'd searched for a way to get more velocity to minimize string jumping. He volunteered nothing about the pre-patent history of the compound bow or that he was motivated by arthritis in his shoulders. Since he had been working on the bow for many years, I imagine he was in his early 40's then and probably not arthritic, as some claim.

I have a good friend in that area who was an active target and hunting archer out of Galena, KS and Joplin, MO. He said that Mr. Allen was rarely seen in archery shops or at archery related events. He has forgotten his occupation, but also visited him a couple times.

A while back I searched "compound" bows, etc. and found a reference to bows with pulleys and wheels in the 1930's in the Eastern US area. My Missouri friend recalls seeing bows with wheels on the SIDES of limbs before Allen's patent.

The lawsuit over patent royalites is public information and so would be the patent application, which should include related historical details on any earlier bows of that type. The family had several that were parties to the lawsuit so maybe one or more can enlighten us further.

Regards,

Kevin
 
#23 ·
first compound

the first compound i ever saw was an allen. it was at an indoor tourn. in joplin,mo. in 1968. mr. allen did not shoot in the tourn. he just wanted people to see it. i can remember everyone looking at it and saying it would never work. were we ever wrong. that bow on the table that day changed archery forever.
i purchased a jennings in 1974 (which i still have) and have been shooting a compound ever since.
 
#27 ·
Dan was correct about Mr Allen being killed in an auto accident, but the reason that the suit was pushed so far was that Mr Allen was killed on the way to court on the law suit.