Joined
·
333 Posts
I have a SB XT on order and it is due to arrive in a week. I took the XT challenge after shooting Fred Bear for many years with no problems and this is the first year I decided to spend over $250 on a bow. Recently I have seen several if not hundreds of threads and posts concerning the cable serving wear on the XT cam and the QCCs needing altered or sanded.
Yes I know I am late in ordering my bow with season 2 weeks away. I was considering selling my Fred Bear to help finance my XT. At this time I am going to wait and see how the XT holds up and use it as a back up. This being the first year in 12 years of hunting I have decided to spend some money on a bow, this XT better hold up better than a $250 Fred Bear. I am amazed at all the common problems I am seeing posted.
There are obviously some problems with the strings and I just read a post on the Mathews forum where two of the moderators got very defensive relating to the string separation problem. I am not sure of the moderators are employees of Mathews, but I would think Mathews had to approve them being moderators. They should not get defensive, but they should react in a professional manner and look into the problem based on so many posts.
Here my thoughts..........Mathews is at a fork in the road. There are obviously some problems with the strings and qccs (at least from all the posts, I may be wrong) and the customer's opinions are starting to sway. Mathews can fix this problem now and either recall or grant credits in replacing their Zebras with a better string or re-engineer or they can get defensive about it and start to lose the following they have built up. This will be interesting to see if they make this business mistake and not fix the problem, if they don't I predict Mathews will fall from grace as a preferred bow manufacturer. Let's see what choice they make.
If I get my bow and it has the same problems (I hope to have no problems), I can guarantee I will do more than post a thread. I will contact the Federal Trade Commission and Consumer's advocates group. At first I was just going to wait until my Mathews arrived and see for myself, but the response of one of the Mathews Moderators in their forums really tee'd me off in how they are handling customer feedback, customers who spend 700+ when they can spend 250 and still harvest a deer or target shoot. For the extra 450, the moderators and techs better be more professional.
Yes I know I am late in ordering my bow with season 2 weeks away. I was considering selling my Fred Bear to help finance my XT. At this time I am going to wait and see how the XT holds up and use it as a back up. This being the first year in 12 years of hunting I have decided to spend some money on a bow, this XT better hold up better than a $250 Fred Bear. I am amazed at all the common problems I am seeing posted.
There are obviously some problems with the strings and I just read a post on the Mathews forum where two of the moderators got very defensive relating to the string separation problem. I am not sure of the moderators are employees of Mathews, but I would think Mathews had to approve them being moderators. They should not get defensive, but they should react in a professional manner and look into the problem based on so many posts.
Here my thoughts..........Mathews is at a fork in the road. There are obviously some problems with the strings and qccs (at least from all the posts, I may be wrong) and the customer's opinions are starting to sway. Mathews can fix this problem now and either recall or grant credits in replacing their Zebras with a better string or re-engineer or they can get defensive about it and start to lose the following they have built up. This will be interesting to see if they make this business mistake and not fix the problem, if they don't I predict Mathews will fall from grace as a preferred bow manufacturer. Let's see what choice they make.
If I get my bow and it has the same problems (I hope to have no problems), I can guarantee I will do more than post a thread. I will contact the Federal Trade Commission and Consumer's advocates group. At first I was just going to wait until my Mathews arrived and see for myself, but the response of one of the Mathews Moderators in their forums really tee'd me off in how they are handling customer feedback, customers who spend 700+ when they can spend 250 and still harvest a deer or target shoot. For the extra 450, the moderators and techs better be more professional.