Joined
·
1,219 Posts
Wow, that's a damn good looking bow!!:darkbeer: Let us no how she performance!!
Why do you say that? Did you not like the bow for some reason? Why?i set up a captain for myself today..watch the classifides!
who made those strings? they look awesome!
and now i am upgrading, 82nd out, Sentinel IN (after i shoot it of course)It has nothing to do with being Crackerized, these bows are hitting over the IBO rated speeds. This is what bowtech wanted, so that they look better than if they don't hit the mark. The only downfall to that is that for someone that walks in to the shop and does not know they are faster than rated, may buy a different bow because of it.
So yes, the speeds that he posted are correct. I had an Admiral hitting 318fps at 29".
It has nothing to do with being Crackerized, these bows are hitting over the IBO rated speeds. This is what bowtech wanted, so that they look better than if they don't hit the mark. The only downfall to that is that for someone that walks in to the shop and does not know they are faster than rated, may buy a different bow because of it.
So yes, the speeds that he posted are correct. I had an Admiral hitting 318fps at 29".
Yeah but as soon as they look at the bow and on the BC it says 320 at 29" they will be pretty surprised and realize the speed. It doesn't show IBO on the bows so I don't see that as a problem. Captain I shot last night was 320 at 29" and chrono proves it correct and thats just from out of the box. Pretty cool getting a bow that is way over its IBO for onceIt has nothing to do with being Crackerized, these bows are hitting over the IBO rated speeds. This is what bowtech wanted, so that they look better than if they don't hit the mark. The only downfall to that is that for someone that walks in to the shop and does not know they are faster than rated, may buy a different bow because of it.
So yes, the speeds that he posted are correct. I had an Admiral hitting 318fps at 29".