Archery Talk Forum banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,945 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Opinions please the good the bad the ugly
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,499 Posts
Have them both but tend to use OT2 more, but they both give similar results.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,321 Posts
I have TAP and it's kind of iffy. I've gotten different results with the same data, I usually have to fake it out to get a correct tape and I've measured with ridiculous accuracy - a digital caliper. Tech support is spotty, sometimes he'll answer, sometimes he'll ignore you. The user interface is nice though.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,669 Posts
I used TAP for awhile, but recently switched to OT2. Tap on the surface seemed easier to use, but I liked the options presented with ot2 (I felt as if the databases were larger).

I like ot2's ability to print target cards and the variety of sight tapes, too. (Tap allows for tapes as well).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,669 Posts
I have TAP and it's kind of iffy. I've gotten different results with the same data, I usually have to fake it out to get a correct tape and I've measured with ridiculous accuracy - a digital caliper. Tech support is spotty, sometimes he'll answer, sometimes he'll ignore you. The user interface is nice though.
One of the reasons for the switch was lack of support.
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top