I am looking at new longbows and am wanting one in the 58" to 60" range. Are there any disadvantages to short longbows?
Less mass at the tips is good, allows you to use heavier arrows and reduces hand shock, that being said though, having all the weight in the riser, with no weight in the limbs, leads to the same problem as with recurves- "spinning". I have not heard of any one else talk of it, but I've found that the stability of the bow comes from heavy limbs and a light riser, at least compared to a modern recurve. Then again, I shoot selfbows and such. Such bows are superior to manufactured glass bows in that they can be built short, but still stable, without pinch from a 55" bow, and other "enomilies" in the modern trad archery world:zip:. Guess I'm done thenI'd agree with you about long bows being smoother but I think your analogy is perhaps a bit off. With limb design you want the least mass in the limbs possible for the energy storage and torsion resistance your design requires. This is one of the design advantages of the ACS limbs--they are very light and have low mass at the tips. A balance pole is the opposite, you want a high moment of inertia so you put a lot of mass at the ends of a long pole--the opposite of what you want in a limb.
Heavily R/D are not the stablest of bows. Actually, if you want stability, a defelxed bow is tops. That's why a straight bow with some string follow is inherintly more accurrate than a reflexed or "curved bows". Not that I'm knocking curved bows, they are wicked perfromers, but in the eyes of stability, there just not tops.Yup...Kegan, I think you've got the pinch and stability thing backwards. The trick is building a LONG heavily R/D bow that's stable and can perform with the best...
That's where the Adcock ACS CX shines, while a burner like the Centaur has limitations.
As for the finger pinch...it's all about string angle. Static tips allow you to get a larger angle with a shorter bow.