Joined
·
2,102 Posts
"The only difference between bows from 2009 and 2013 is four years and $500."
I have a buddy that's going to Montana with me this fall to chase elk on his very first bowhunting trip. He's on a tight budget and will be looking to outfit a full archery setup for around $500. I recommended the 2009 Elite GT500 to him, knowing that it's a solid bow with modern specs. Regardless of brand choice, I encouraged him to shop for used gear, as I see little additional benefit gained from spending the extra cash on the latest models. Basically, the new stuff is not improved enough to justify the added expense when considering pure function alone.
Just thought I'd throw this out for discussion, knowing that this idea is completely subjective. Tell me why I'm right or wrong.
I have a buddy that's going to Montana with me this fall to chase elk on his very first bowhunting trip. He's on a tight budget and will be looking to outfit a full archery setup for around $500. I recommended the 2009 Elite GT500 to him, knowing that it's a solid bow with modern specs. Regardless of brand choice, I encouraged him to shop for used gear, as I see little additional benefit gained from spending the extra cash on the latest models. Basically, the new stuff is not improved enough to justify the added expense when considering pure function alone.
Just thought I'd throw this out for discussion, knowing that this idea is completely subjective. Tell me why I'm right or wrong.