[tzellma1998]

I'm looking to get a thumb button release, and am torn between the Scott Sigma and any of the Carter releases. I know that Carter makes quite a selection, and have heard good things, but am pretty loyal to Scott releases. This would be my first thumb button, and I want to make the best purchase I can. I'm looking for some insight, and I'm sure I'll get it here, thanks

Z

 

[Larry brown]

Carter is good, Stan is better(for me) and Scott hasn’t been on my top of the list.
I love my stab sx3. Really adjustable and has good cs. Carter is less adjustable and doesn’t fit my hand as well and isn’t as crisp. Just my Opinion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[wstanley]

I have the Stan SX-3, but have shot the Scott Exxus, Truball 360 ST (liked it), Truball Max , Tru Ball Absolute 360 (liked) and Stan Perfex (really liked it). I ended up sticking with the SX-3 as it was the best for me in fit and adjustability as well as workmanship.

 

[jakep567]

Love my stan sx3 i wont use anything else it took 10 releases to get there

 

[billp1044]

Best advice would be to try both to see which one works best for you

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk

 

[GREENBALL]

Stan’s have a much better trigger system than the Scott. Carters are great but lack adjustability in the trigger.

 

[45er]

Stan’s have a much better trigger system than the Scott. Carters are great but lack adjustability in the trigger.

Would you please be more explicit and describe in what way "Stan's have a much better trigger system than the Scott." What attributes of the trigger are notably "better"?

Thank you.

 

[Larry brown]

Would you please be more explicit and describe in what way "Stan's have a much better trigger system than the Scott." What attributes of the trigger are notably "better"?

Thank you.

I think they have one of the best because you can get it fine tuned to your personal shooting style, it’s more of a crisp click on the shot than carter(never shot the scotts but haven’t seen anyone shooting to so maybe a reason) and I like you can rotate the thumb position a lot of differing ways which makes it easier to tune to the shooter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ppkaprince98]

Carter is good, Stan is better(for me) and Scott hasn’t been on my top of the list.
I love my stan sx3. Really adjustable and has good cs. Carter is less adjustable and doesn’t fit my hand as well and isn’t as crisp. Just my Opinion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Im with Larry.

 

[evox]

I think they have one of the best because you can get it fine tuned to your personal shooting style, it’s more of a crisp click on the shot than carter(never shot the scotts but haven’t seen anyone shooting to so maybe a reason) and I like you can rotate the thumb position a lot of differing ways which makes it easier to tune to the shooter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

currently been shooting a nock 2 it for a while, i gave my buddy my sx3 after shooting the nock 2 it. it that is the biggest thing i miss about the sx3, being able to position the peg where you want it.. probably would take it back if he didn’t live in a different state now lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[tzellma1998]

Thanks for all the posts, I think I'll go w/ the Stan

 

[MAD 6]

Get a Stan and a Carter - I love my Shootoff TL but I also love my Evo+, SilverBack and Nock 2 It, can't go wrong with any of them. I would avoid the Scott, didn't care for any I tried.

 

[tzellma1998]

I also see there are so many types of Carters. I've heard good things about them, what models do you guys recommend?

 

[tzellma1998]

I got a Carter, and love it. I got a good deal on that release, which is why I chose that one over a Stan. It's amazing how clean the break of the trigger is compared to my conventional wrist lanyard scott.

 

[svhunter]

Just curious which carter? I have shot a lot and have come back to the carter too simple both times i've bought. The elk woods ate my first one. Stupid me!