I'm trying to do my homework before getting a noncompund bow that I will shoot a lot but the ultimate purpose is for hunting. I am pretty set on a 17 or 19" ilf riser from the usual manufacturers: tradtech, Morrison, das, Hoyt,and sky. It seems all of the risers can accept a plunger, elevated rest, sites and quiver but some have a radiused shelf. Both flat and radiused are acceptable to me, I figure I can set either up for off the shelf or rest. So the real difference is the geometry, I think it's called reflex or deflex, and weight. I got to shoot a satori, buffalo, dorado, and dalaa all 19" risers I believe but probably won't get a chance to try the others. The satori seemed to be the one with the most angle, high brace height, and seemed way different than old school recurves I used to shoot. It shot consistent for me but it didn't seem right, maybe I'd get used to the angle. Is it supposed to offer an advantage on than maybe giving you a higher brace height? From the looks online the dalaa and titan have the next most angle and sky and Morrison are the straightest. My question is what type of geometry would you guys recommend and why? And does going from 19" to 17" riser cost you much in stability, vibration, or accuracy? Shorter is better when hunting but those 19 riser bows I shot would have been fine for taking into the woods. I'm leaning towards a titan, they seem the most common on classifieds, even though I don't really like the broadhead cut outs I care much more about cost and functionality.