Archery Talk Forum banner

2025 Hunting Bow Speed Test (6 Bows!) + Video

5.7K views 47 replies 29 participants last post by  Stormin30  
#1 ·
The hunting bow speed test is always one of the most popular videos I put out each year...and despite the fact that I'm just reporting numbers, it's also one I get the most negative feedback from. Math, it turns out, is mean and scary.

This year I've got six bows in for testing. I set them all up with 70 pounds of draw weight and 30 inches of draw length. I shot each of them with the same 350-grain arrow and the same 455-grain arrow through the same chronograph in the same location. They all have the same peep sight installed, as well as a D-loop.

Each bow is tuned to the heavier 455-grain arrow (I only shoot the 350-grain arrow for the speed tests).

Here are the bows, in order of slowest to fastest reported speed.

Darton Sequel 35 ST2 (335 FPS)
Prime Form (336 FPS)
Elite HNTR 33 (336 FPS)
Bowtech Proven 34 (336 FPS)
Xpedition XLite 32 (342 FPS)
Mathews Lift X 33 (343 FPS)

Besides showing which bows were fastest, I also look at how closely each bow comes to hitting its advertised speed. In my mind, that is the more important metric. This year two bows came incredibly close to nailing that number.

 
#8 ·
The fasted IBO bow was not the fasted tested bow which I think tends to be the case in a lot of these tests, as long as the ibo's are similar like these... 2 of the bows actually are hitting their IBO or possibly overachieving when you factor in the peep and loop, a few fell a bit short. That said the speed difference across the board is very similar. Performance of bows in terms of speed has been pretty much maxed out for over a decade. It's good to see most of these bows at least in the ballpark of their IBO ratings though. Really hard to buy a bad bow in todays market.
 
#6 ·
Why test flagship bows from all the companies EXCEPT Elite, not a good test but it still out preformed almost all of the others
 
#20 ·
This test just proves to me that speed is pretty much irrelevant in today’s bows. 9fps is nothing. A guy should go totally on what feels best in his hands. They all have sufficient speed these days.

When I went new bow shopping a couple months ago, I shot a lot of different models. One by one, I weeded bows out for different reasons til I got down to 2 - Sequel 35 and LiftX. These were all set at 60# and I was using my heavy FMJ’s, and when I got down to the 2, I literally could not make up my mind because they were so close.

A bow tech at the shop came over and I explained my decision dilemma. He said, “Why don’t you shoot them thru the chronograph and see if that helps you decide.”.

So I did, and there was a whopping 1fps difference. In the end, I just couldn’t justify the extra $250 for the LiftX.

I’ve now had my Sequel 35 for the better part of a month and it just keeps getting better every day. I am thoroughly convinced I made the right decision for me by going with the Darton.

Bisch
 
#27 ·
Maybe that is starting to happen so they don't lose face? IOW in the past most people never knew. Heck even now a lot of people don't have chrono's but a LOT more do and a lot of people are testing them on the net so maybe they don't want to fudge it so much?

Plus as mentioned the speed for now is getting pretty tapped out unless you go to extremes so maybe that helps?
 
#44 · (Edited)
THANK YOU Lucas for doing this video. I like all your videos and appreciate the time and effort it takes to make them. I am still shooting a Mathews V3X33 and each year consider a new bow but the price is hard to justify for a few extra FPS!