I'm putting together a new setup, went to several charts online, including Easton and Black Eagle to find an optimum arrow spine for my rig, then went to the AA site, they couldn't more different, now I'm just getting more confused:
Here is my rig, CD34 and or an E35 - 57lbs, 28.75" shaft and a 29" draw and 116 grain point weight.
Easton recommends a 400 spine as does Black Eagle but I'm using a 340 Axis 5mm and a Black Eagle Rampage 350, according to AA the 400 spines are too weak and the 340/350 spines are marginally too weak, AA recommends a 300 spine for both. Why such a wide discrepancy?
I have been shooting the 340 and 350 shafts and I'm not very consistent even at 20 yards - I should be stacking arrows at that distance - didn't want to believe it was the arrows but now I'm not too sure? Any thoughts?
Here is my rig, CD34 and or an E35 - 57lbs, 28.75" shaft and a 29" draw and 116 grain point weight.
Easton recommends a 400 spine as does Black Eagle but I'm using a 340 Axis 5mm and a Black Eagle Rampage 350, according to AA the 400 spines are too weak and the 340/350 spines are marginally too weak, AA recommends a 300 spine for both. Why such a wide discrepancy?
I have been shooting the 340 and 350 shafts and I'm not very consistent even at 20 yards - I should be stacking arrows at that distance - didn't want to believe it was the arrows but now I'm not too sure? Any thoughts?