I've been meaning to experiment with a higher foc, say 15% and more. So whose doing it, whats yor set up and whats your experience with it?
With a higher FOC, naturally the balance point is closer to the tip end and farther from the nock end (and fletching). The farther the balance point is from the fletching, the easier it is for the fletching to steer the arrow - thereby allowing the use of smaller (and lighter) fletching (I'm sure the physics police from another world will find fault with this). I'm at 13% (with my measurement method) and I'd have to go to 125gr to get any more which I don't want to do.What I found out is this: I could use much smaller vanes w/this BH and it 'appeared' that the arrow flew perfectly down range. How small a vane? W/the XL150 I used 3 3d vanes! and the arrow flew perfectly--the AAE 187 vanes that I'm using for my 3d rig! I was REALLY surprised at this. Am I hunting w/this set-up? No, I sent w/3 mini Blazers.
I would also be VERY interested in these results as this is a hotly debated topic over here in South Africa ...Quote:
Originally Posted by EnglishKev
I shoot just over 20%.
They tune well and fly even better.
I am currently building a couple of arrows to test the 'high FOC drops faster' theory.
So, two arrows, identical length, spine and weight, same fletching, one high FOC, one low FOC.
I will post the results over the weekend (weather permitting).
Kev
Not necessarily something large, but I am tired of passing up shots just because the animal was not presenting a good broad side or quatering away shot. I want something that will be able to go through fairly heavy bone on most of the antilope species in South Africa.... unless your hunting something very large