I don't think you can really compare the two or say one person is a "better hunter", they are both amazingly successful hunters but have two totally different styles of hunting. I live in the area that John hunts a lot in southern MI, and for him to be killing the deer that he does in this area is pretty amazing. The amount of pressure that these grounds get is intense, from Oct. 1 archery/crossbow season to the orange army of the Nov. 15 gun season, which essentially goes until Jan 1 now. I don't totally agree with some of his beliefs on scent control either, but I have read his books and he gets total respect from me. I think the biggest factor in their success (John and his son Chris) is the year round scouting and preparation. John has said in a few podcasts that he doesn't really care about the wind, and he is obviously a firm believer in activated carbon technology, but I don't think it's all sponsor driven. He really knows all of the science behind it and he really believes in it. Listen to Podcast #18 of "Deer Hunter Podcast", I think that is the one where he goes in to his beliefs on the science of activated carbon. If you honestly believe that something works that's half the success right there. That being said, I think he is also a scent control nut, not just showers and washing, but to the extent of changing his diet during hunting season, etc. So that probably plays a big role in the success he may have with deer downwind regardless of whether or not the activated carbon works or not. You can't argue with his results on HIGHLY pressured public ground. Dan Infalt is also a slayer in the deer woods, but really a totally different style, and his podcasts, videos, and forum are pretty entertaining and informative, so they both get much respect from me.