Archery Talk Forum banner

Mathews Phase 4 vs. V3X

12K views 21 replies 14 participants last post by  Cfurrow  
#1 ·

I was fortunate enough to spend a few days comparing the Mathews V3x and Phase 4 on my home range this week. I am just as impressed with the Phase 4 as I was with the V3X. Speed and Sound were very similar in both models, with a distinct advantage in measured vibration. I hope you all enjoy the video, if you have any bows or products you’d like to see reviewed/tested in the future, please leave a comment.

The draw is exactly the same, as these two bows are the same cams, mods, and ergonomics/geometry. The only real changes are the new limbs and inline stabilizer cutouts. I also have a video about the stabs, and my conclusion is, they are a really well engineered and manufactured product that answers a question that no one is asking.

There may also be some errors in my data, so take into consideration. The vibration meter I have one has one accelerometer, it was placed on the berger hole bolt holding the rest on the bows. Mathews likely had a vibe meter with multiple measuring points and took averages from that. I don’t know if I can accurately refute, or support Mathews’ claims of improvements. The measurements I did get showed an improvement in vibration for the Phase 4. I also do not know what difference in vibration a human can detect through the sense of feel. I feel like I did felt like a felt difference, could be a placebo, idk.

Phase 4: 31.965 mm/s

V3X: 44.18 mm/s

Speed: No change. There was .5 fps difference between the 2 groups and there are many variables that could cause a difference when testing with a chronograph.

Sound : I will make a retraction video for my test video for sound. I’m not entirely sure that what is seen in the videos Ive made isn’t the arrow impacting the target rather than the actual sound of the bow. The measurements I recorded had a slight favor towards the V3X, in a 1.3 dB advantage. Ive read that humans change only detect changes in the 10-decibel volume range. After working on aircraft for my entire career, mine is probably around 25 dB, when my ears are ringing.

V3X: 79.1 dB

Phase 4: 80.425 dB

Grip: Exact same

Draw: Exact same

Hold: Exact Same

Shot: Slight improvement in felt vibration for the Phase 4. I didn’t notice any improvement in balance using the new stabs.

Technology: Phase 4 has the new vibe and sound suppressing material sandwiched between each set of limbs and a new integrated stabilizer system, that is very costly. Everything else is the same as the V3X.

Conclusion. If you have a V3X like me, I personally wouldn’t buy a Phase 4. It would be cheaper to add limb dampeners between the limbs or buy an adjustable stab, like the crossover stabs on my V3X.

If you don’t have a Phase 4, it is one of the top 2 bows Ive shot this year. The Hoyt VTM 31 and Phase 4 29 are still the top of the class in my opinion. I really like the SS34 and Omnia, but the Mathews and Hoyt were just so effortless to hold on target and shoot repeatable shoots for me.
 
#6 ·
Thank you, and I love the V3X. The biggest difference between the P4 and V3X is the bridelock stabilizers mount. With limb dampeners installed the V3X actually had less vibration.


YouTube and Instagram: 6 Saturdays a Week
 
#5 ·
My test of the CBE, Vibe X Beacon limb dampener on my V3X is on my channel. It provides some vibration levels of the V3X with these dampeners install, and compares them to the phase 4.



YouTube and Instagram: 6 Saturdays a Week
 
#7 ·
Good review. I have shot both and, unless I willing to drop the $$$$$ on all the Mathews stuff, I'd stay with a V3X
 
#13 ·
That’s something I hear pretty frequently. I personally like the SW cams. I wish they would redesign it, without the yoke splitter so cables can be replaced without taking the cams off.


YouTube and Instagram: 6 Saturdays a Week
 
#10 ·
I've owned several of both, and own a Phase4 29 now.
I feel like the Phase4 29 feels just a bit more refined on the shot than the V3x.
I think the limb dampening system works to kill a little vibe, and slightly quiet the bow.
Very hard to improve on the deadest and quietest system on the market, but they did.............slightly.
Note: I have not shot one (and won't) with the integrated stabilizer system, but I know those who do and are.
They say it does work to an extent.

I can't remember the last time I hunted a Mathews, this October I believe the 29 is going to get the nod.
It's a great bow.
 
#14 ·
I can understand the refined aspect, I wouldn’t upgrade from a V3X to a Phase 4. I’d just put limb dampeners in and call it a day. I wasn’t overly impressed with the stabilizer system, over engineering at its finest, in my personal opinion. If a archer chooses to go with the bridge lock stab, they are stuck with purchasing everything from Mathews. They eliminated the archers ability to customizing the feel of the bow, unless they purchase from Mathews, with the bridge lock stabs. From what I understand, additional weights are 20/oz.


YouTube and Instagram: 6 Saturdays a Week
 
#15 ·
Phase 4 -29 shoots very smooth and it's very easy to hold on target. I prefer the 29 over 33. great review!
Thank you! I felt the same way when I bout the V3X.


YouTube and Instagram: 6 Saturdays a Week
 
#21 ·
V3X give you the inline sight and quiver option, and that's already tweaking something that works. If you're buying new, I'd probably say go straight to the Phase 4, but to upgrade from the V3X, you may as well just assume you're buying all of Mathews new accessories and stabilizers otherwise it's pointless IMO.