The main difference is the price. Being serious. I owned a Revex 4, shot the Ronan and the RVX 34, and bought the RVX 34. The Ronan doesn't get free string for life like the other 2.

I would have bought the Ronan, but it only had 1 rest mounting hole and my Vaportrail Gen 7 wouldn't work well at all on it. Instead of throwing money at a rest, I threw money at the bow. If my rest would have worked, I would have bought the Ronan.

 

Hmmmmmm, thats what I'm trying to figure out. I bought a Revex 6 last year and love it. I basically made up my mind I was going to sell my CT5 and buy a Revex 4 to hunt with, then they throw this at us. Two of them are essentially identical, and the other is missing a couple features that I dont personally care about, but 2 string sets later the cost is equal.
So I was hoping there was an actual felt difference at the shot to make the choice easier.
I have a few months to decide.

 

Hmmmmmm, thats what I'm trying to figure out. I bought a Revex 6 last year and love it. I basically made up my mind I was going to sell my CT5 and buy a Revex 4 to hunt with, then they throw this at us. Two of them are essentially identical, and the other is missing a couple features that I dont personally care about, but 2 string sets later the cost is equal.
So I was hoping there was an actual felt difference at the shot to make the choice easier.
I have a few months to decide.

I actually weighed the Ronan and RVX 34 on the same scale. The Ronan was 4.5lbs and the RVX 34 was 4.6lbs.
If I was a Hamskea fan, or the shop had one in stock, I probably would have left with the Ronan.

You really can't go wrong either way.

 

Backyard Bows on YouTube has a review on all 3 of those models. He has some interesting comments on them and as I recall the Revex was his fave of the 3.

 

Nice, i'll check it out