In my very young archery career, I am, unfortunately, one of those people obsessing over KE and FPS until I inevitably one day begin to preach that it really doesn't matter and anything on a modern bow over 25 ft/lbs will still kill the buck.
Until then, however, I am curious about opinions on the effect that different releases have on DL and in turn KE and the speed of your arrow. In looking at the smallest variances for KE optimization, I would imagine that a release in which the jaw is closer to the palm of your hand would allow for a longer drawback. If speed is the goal, releases that have adjustable lengths should be set at the shortest possible length while still being able to pull the trigger. I could be completely wrong about this but this would add at least a half an inch to your DL, would it not? That in turn means an extra 5fps just because you shortened your release length. I would love to hear y'all's thoughts.
Also, I'd be curious (for the same reason) to know if any manufacturers are making releases where the trigger is directly next to the jaw rather than behind it
Until then, however, I am curious about opinions on the effect that different releases have on DL and in turn KE and the speed of your arrow. In looking at the smallest variances for KE optimization, I would imagine that a release in which the jaw is closer to the palm of your hand would allow for a longer drawback. If speed is the goal, releases that have adjustable lengths should be set at the shortest possible length while still being able to pull the trigger. I could be completely wrong about this but this would add at least a half an inch to your DL, would it not? That in turn means an extra 5fps just because you shortened your release length. I would love to hear y'all's thoughts.
Also, I'd be curious (for the same reason) to know if any manufacturers are making releases where the trigger is directly next to the jaw rather than behind it