Archery Talk Forum banner

Broadhead best pick--Grim Reaper 1 3/8" 3 blade v. Rage Chisel Tip 2"--2 blade??

7.2K views 71 replies 27 participants last post by  shooterrdy  
#1 ·
Broadhead best pick--Grim Reaper 1 3/8" 3 blade v. Rage Chisel Tip 2"--2 blade??

Hi everyone,
Many thanks in advance to all who reply. I've managed to confuse myself as to which broad head to go with this year.

Choice #1: Grim Reaper 1 3/8" 3 blade 100g
https://www.amazon.com/Reaper-Broadhead-Razorctip-1903-100gr/dp/B000IERL1O

Choice #2: Rage Chisel Tip 2"--2 blade 100g
https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1...e-chisel-tip-2-blade-mechanical-broadhead-with-shock-collar-100-grain-pack-of-3

I used the Grim Reaper last year and shot a 180lb 8 pointer....hit near perfect on a broadside shot at 30 yards, arrow went across chest and vanes stopped dead center inside his chest cavity (broad head punched through opposite side). Could not believe he ran about "250 yards" and that's motivated me to look at Rage or other...

I'm tempted to stick with the Grim reapers because they flew good, UNLESS someone convinces me to switch to Rage (above).

My setup---Mathews Helium (beloved); 28.5", 400 grain Easton Axis n-fused, 58 or 59 lb draw weight.

Greatly appreciate 1st hand experience with either of these heads--should I stay the course with the Grim Reapers or switch to Rage??

Thanks,
Roberthood
 
Discussion starter · #12 ·
Thanks for the great replies so far! In summary, it sounds like you guys like both but now considering my KE which might be a tad lower (260 FPS, 400 grain arrow, 58/59 lbs Helium....and yes 400 spine too as someone above asked). KE = 60 ft lbs I think?

Thus with KE 60 — would I be better off with the rage chisel tip 2” 2 blade slip cam style as opposed to the grim reaper 1 3/8” 3 blade — over the top style—as far as pass throughs are concerned and overall performance like field tips?

Note I think the hypodermics with the steeper blade angle would be tougher to get a pass through so sort of leaving that one out.

Thanks again to all
 
Discussion starter · #14 ·
Just another thought—-before switching to the grim reaper 1 3/8” 2 years ago, I was using Slick Trick Mags 1 1/4” heads. I compared these ST heads side by side to the grim reapers and even though the difference in size is miniscule the grim reaper looks way way bigger.

I still have 6 ST mags so could always switch back.
 
Discussion starter · #17 ·
I’m definitely no expert at mechanicals but believe the rage chisel tips use a “shock collar” instead of a rubber band which was an older design. Not sure how the shock collar works but it sounds better than a rubber band to retain the blades in the fly position.

I’m leaning now to making the switch to the rage slip cam chisels....still thinking.
 
Discussion starter · #23 ·
Many thanks for all the great information. I'm thinking to call Grim Reaper today and see what they spec for KE on the 1 3/8. They must have test info. Time permitting, I'll call Rage as well for the same info on the 2" chisel and will report back here.

Thanks for all the 1st hand experience with these heads so far.
 
Discussion starter · #31 ·
That last reply (thanks plecavalier) got me thinking about my old reliable ST Mags again. I'm now literally jammed between the Rage SC 2" 2 blade, because I believe they will use "less KE" to open than the GR and thus use more energy for the "pass through."

The other part of the jam here is going back to my old reliable ST Mags. They fly good and do some damage on impact.
 
Discussion starter · #36 ·
Wowzer--read that 3x. I completely agree if all that concerned is penetration. In other words, and simply put, the best penetration would come from a needle like head or even a target arrow, but that would cause the least cutting damage to the animal. Maybe I should have emphasized --getting a pass through and causing the most damage to the animal. There is definitely going to be a balance there.

It seems like heads that cut the most--lose the most energy at a faster rate...therein is the "balance" of blade width to pass through probability.

Phew--that's a lot to think about.